Ventricular Arrhythmia Alerts and Survival in Patients with Implantable Defibrillators under Remote Monitoring

pp. 343-349

Authors

  • Juan P. Guzman Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9889-6145
  • Pedro Díaz Uberti Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6844-8085
  • Francisco Toscano Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5802-9136
  • Valeria Piazza Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-5486
  • Damián Longo Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-7436
  • Fiorella Mancusi Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3152-9746
  • Juan Manuel Villalba Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1471-4037
  • Rodolfo Daniel La Greca Arrhythmias and Pacemakers Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires Cardiology Department, Hospital Churruca Visca, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3804-1912

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v93.i5.20938

Keywords:

Implantable defibrillators, Cardiac arrhythmias, Remote monitoring, Mortality, Prognosis

Abstract

Background: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) can be followed-up with remote monitoring(RM), which allows the evaluation of complex and serious arrhythmias .
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmia alerts on mortality in patients with implantable devices
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 62 patients, analyzing demographic and clinical data and RM alerts: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF)and its prognostic value for mortality .
Results: 35.5% of patients presented alerts for ventricular arrhythmias. They had worse left ventricular ejection fraction and a higher prevalence of heart failure. During follow-up, they had higher all-cause mortality (40.9% in the group with alerts vs. 7.5% in the group without alerts; p=0.003). Survival analysis confirmed that these patients had a significantly lower probability of survival (Log-Rank test, p=0.006).
Conclusion: The occurrence of alerts for ventricular arrhythmias detected by RM was a significant prognostic marker of lower survival, underscoring the value of this technology for risk stratification  and clinical decision-making. A larger patient cohort and longer follow-up are needed to confirm its independent prognostic value.

Published

2025-12-12

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)