Vascular and Valvular Load in Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Normal Ejection Fraction

pp. 30-38

Authors

  • Ricardo A. Migliore Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • María E. Adaniya Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Diego Mantilla Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Miguel Barranco Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Sergio Vergara Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Martín Bruzzese Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Guillermo Miramont Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.
  • Horacio Tamagusuku Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v77i1.2104

Keywords:

Aortic Stenosis, Systole / Physiology, Arteries, Elasticity

Abstract

Background

Some patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may present reduced stroke volume (SV) and low transvalvular gradients despite normal ejection fraction (EF). The reduction in the aortic valve area (AVA) and the increase in the vascular load contribute to decrease the SV.

Objective

To analyze the vascular and valvular load in low-flow/lowgradient severe aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction.

Material and Methods

A total of 53 patients (70±12 years) with severe AS (AVA <1 cm2) and EF ≥50% were studied. Valvular load was estimated using the AVA and the energy loss index (ELI). Vascular load was evaluated by means of the effective arterial elastance (Ea) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) was calculated as an estimation of global left ventricular (LV) afterload. Ea was estimated as the ratio between end-systolic pressure and SV. End-systolic pressure was obtained by tonometry. Zva was calculated as: (systolic arterial pressure + mean net pressure gradient) / SV index. Patients were divided in two groups: normal flow (NF) (n=35), defined as a SV index >35 ml/m2, or low flow (LF) (n=18), with a SV index ≤35 ml/m2.

Results

Compared to NF patients, LF patients had lower AVA (0.59±0.18 versus 0.76±0.22 cm2; p<0.01), mean pressure gradient (28±5 versus 45±4 mm Hg; p<0.01) and ELI (0.35±0.13 versus 0.47±0.16 cm2/m2; p<0.01). Vascular load was greater in LF patients than in NF patients, with higher values of Ea (1.91±0.42 versus 1.24±0.33 mm Hg/ml; p<0.00001), SVR (2.119±506 versus 1.625 ± 443 mm Hg · min/L; p<0.001) and global afterload measured by Zva (5.45±1.39 versus 3.95±1.10 mm Hg/ml/m2; p<0.001). At univariate analysis, SV correlated with Ea (r= –0.87, p<0.0001), SVR (r= –0.73, p<0.0001) and Zva (r= –0.71, p<0.0001). Ea was the only independent predictor of reduced SV at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In patients with severe AS, the physiopathology of LF seems to be related to a significant increase in the vascular load.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-03

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>