Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Thromboembolic Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

pp. 512-518

Authors

  • Aldo G. Carrizo Cardiac Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Unit, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University. Ontario, Canada.
  • Madhu Natarajan Heart Investigation Unit, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University. Ontario, Canada. Population Health Research Institute. Ontario, Canada.
  • Sebastian Ribas Cardiac Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Unit, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University. Ontario, Canada.
  • James Velianou Heart Investigation Unit, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University. Ontario, Canada.
  • Carlos A. Morillo Cardiac Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Unit, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University. Ontario, Canada. Population Health Research Institute. Ontario, Canada.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v83.i6.7272

Keywords:

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Appendage, Stroke/prevention and control

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) produces a five-fold increase in the risk of stroke, and the exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA), the main source of thrombi, is an interesting therapeutic option in patients with contraindication for oral anticoagulation.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the initial experience, immediate results and outcome at 45 days of percutaneous closure of the LAA in patients with AF and high risk of thromboembolic events, in whom chronic oral anticoagulation was contraindicated.
Methods: Twenty-two patients with non-valvular AF and a CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 in whom there was contraindication or impossibility of long-term oral anticoagulation underwent percutaneous closure of the LAA with the WATCHMAN™ device. The patients were evaluated 45 days after the procedure by clinical assessment and transesophageal echocardiography.
Results: The implant was successful in 21 of 22 patients (95.4%). Median (interquartile range) age and CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 76 years (IQR 14.5), 5 (IQR 1.5) and 4 (IQR 1), respectively. Three (13.6%) periprocedural complications were observed: one cardiac tamponade requiring surgery, one concealed major bleeding and one pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery. No device-related complications or thromboembolic events were observed during the 45-day follow-up. The LAA was adequately excluded in 95% of the cases.
Conclusions: In our initial experience, the procedure is feasible, with an acceptable risk, and can be considered a therapeutic option in patients with AF and high thromboembolic risk who cannot receive oral anticoagulation.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)