The perfusion clinical syndrome: a new prognostic index in acute myocardial infarction
pp 549-554
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v60i6.3329Abstract
With the aim to know the independent prognostic value of reperfusion clinical syndrome (RCS) 164 consecutive patients with AMI who received thrombolytic treatment (TT) within 6 hours of onset of symptoms were studied. The RCS was defined by the presence of at least two of the following criteria two hours after TT: 1) significant relief of pain (a five point reduction in a one to ten subjective score); 2) ≥ 50 % reduction of summatory of ST segment elevation; 3) abrupt initial increase of CK levels (more than two-fold over the upper-normal or baseline elevated values). By means of bivariate analysis the r of Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained for the association between inhospital mortality and the following clinical variables: sex, age, previous history of hypertension, diabetes, and myocardial infarction, acute or chronic anginal prodromes (< or > than one month), systolic pressure at admission, Killip-Kimball index at admission (Ka) and maximum during hospital stay (Km), Peel (P) index and RCS. In order of signi- ficance the Km (r = 0.598; P < 0.001), Peel index (r = 0.457; P < 0.001), Ka (r = 0.351; P < 0.001), RCS (r=0.283); p<O.OOI) and age (r=0.190; p<0.05) were associated with mortality. By multivariate analysis (logistic regression) maximum Killip-Kimball index (p < 0.0001), age (p = 0.01) and the absence of RCS (r =0.02) were independent predictors of mortality. The presence of RCS defined a group of patients with significant lower mortality (odds ratio: 0.20; 95 % confidence interval: 0.05-0.87). In conclusion, the age and the hemodynamic impairment were main determinants of inhospital outcome. In view of his independent value, the RCS may by used as a new prognostic index to identify a higher risk group of patients in which a more interventional post-thrombolysis strategy could be tested. Our results suggest that the RCS could be routinely adopted in the evaluation an management of AMI patients in the thrombolytic era.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Argentine Journal of Cardiology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







