Efficacy and Safety of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement under General Anesthesia versus Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation

pp. 33-39

Authors

  • Marcelo Abud Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Gerardo Nau Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Alfosina Candiello Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Lucio T. Padilla Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Fernando Piccinini Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Marcelo Trivi Division of Cardiology, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • María F. Castro Division Diagnostic Imaging, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Ricardo E. Ronderos Division Diagnostic Imaging, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Alberto G. Dorsa Division of Anesthesiology, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
  • Fernando A. Cura Head of the Division of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v86.i1.12981

Keywords:

Aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, general anesthesia, local anesthesia.

Abstract

 

Background: Currently, there is no consensus about the most adequate anesthetic management in transfemoral transcatheter
aortic valve replacement. Although it has been shown that local anesthesia (LA) with or without conscious sedation is feasible,
clinical results are controversial.


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement
performed under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation.


Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral
transcatheter aortic valve replacement between March 2009 and December 2016. The population was divided according to anesthetic management. Safety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at 30-days and were classified according to definitions of the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. In addition, key times during hospitalization were evaluated.


Results: A total of 121 patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement under general anesthesia (n=55,45.5%) or local anesthesia with conscious sedation (n=66,54.5%). were included in this analysis. Mean age was 83.2±5.7 years and 48.8% were men. There were no differences in either the procedural result or in the 30-day efficacy and safety outcomes.
The rate of death at 30-days was 7.3% in the group with general anesthesia and 3% in the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group (log-rank p 0.28). The need of conversion to general anesthesia was 3% (2 patients), in all cases due to major vascular complications during the procedure. In the local anesthesia with conscious sedation group shorter procedural time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were observed.


Conclusions: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation
seems to be a safe and effective alternative to the use of general anesthesia.

Published

2025-06-10

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>