Association between Diastolic Wall Stress in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure

pp. 163-170

Authors

  • Ricardo A. Migliore Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • María E. Adaniya Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • Guillermo Miramont Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • Guillermo Miramont Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • Miguel Barranco Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • Silvia González Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
  • Horacio Tamagusuku Hospital Eva Perón de San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v86.i3.12312

Keywords:

Heart Failure, Diastolic/physiopathology - Aortic Valve Stenosis Vascular Stiffness - Elasticity/physiology

Abstract

Background: The pathophysiology of diastolic left ventricular dysfunction includes abnormalities in ventricular relaxation, passive elastic stiffness or a combination of both mechanisms. Doppler echocardiography can evaluate ventricular relaxation but not passive elastic stiffness. Diastolic wall stress evaluates passive elastic stiffness through the reduction of end-diastolic myocardial compression.


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate passive elastic stiffness by means of diastolic wall stress in patients with severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and its association with class III-IV heart failure.


Methods: A total of 76 patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years) with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area < 0.6 cm2/m2) and ejection fraction of 50% or  greater were evaluated. Diastolic wall stress was calculated as: (systolic posterior wall thickness - diastolic posterior wall thickness) / systolic posterior wall thickness measured in mode M echocardiography. E/e’ ratio, end diastolic left ventricular pressure and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship were calculated by non-invasive methods. The patients were divided in two groups: group: heart failure class III-IV (n = 5 patients) and group 2: without heart failure (n = 71 patients).


Results: Passive elastic stiffness was greater in patients in group 1, demonstrated by reduced diastolic wall stress (0.23 ± 0.05 vs. 0.30 ± 0.06 p < 0.01), and higher E/e’ ratio (20 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 8 p < 0.05), end-diastolic left ventricular pressure and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship.


Conclusion: Diastolic wall stress could detect abnormalities in passive elastic stiffness in patients with severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure that cannot be evaluated using the traditional parameters of diastolic function.

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>