Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide and troponin I in moderate and high risk pulmonary embolism

pp. 271-2

Authors

  • Guillermo Jaimovich Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist
  • Juan Benger Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiology Resident
  • Walter M. Masson Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist. Staff MD at the Department of Cardiology.
  • Mauro L. Giacomini Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist.
  • Pablo F. Oberti Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist. Head of the Cardiac Imaging Section.
  • José L. Navarro Estrada Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist. Head of the Coronary Care Unit.
  • Arturo M. Cagide Department of Cardiology, Instituto de Medicina Cardiovascular, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. MD, Cardiologist. Head of the Department of Cardiology.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v80.i4.1329

Keywords:

Pulmonary Embolism, Brain Natriuretic Peptide, Troponin, Risk stratification

Abstract

Background: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponins are useful markers for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it is not clear which of the two biomarkers has better association with the clinical severity of this condition.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess both biomarkers in moderate and high risk populations.
Methods: A prospective study was undertaken to analyze all patients diagnosed with PE who had positive troponin I (TI) or BNP levels. An echocardiogram within the first 24 hours and clinical follow-up during hospitalization were performed. A composite endpoint of death, recurrent PE, shock, hypotension, mechanical respiratory assistance, and thrombolytic therapy was established. The association of both serum markers with the described events was assessed.
Results: Seventy-one consecutive patients were included. Patients with moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction had higher BNP levels (661 pg/ml [420-1113] vs. 316 pg/ml [129-570]; p = 0.002) without significant difference in TI levels (0.115 ng/ml [0.015-0.345] vs. 0.24 ng/ml [0.076-0.58]; p = 0.0788). BNP levels were higher in patients with the composite endpoint [604 pg/ml (370-934) vs. 316 pg/ml (148-900); p = 0.042], whereas no similar association was found for TI [0.12 ng/ml (0.037-0.48) vs. 0.13 ng/ml (0.07-0.41); p = 0.46].
Conclusions: BNP showed higher values in patients with right ventricular dysfunction and in those reaching the composite endpoint, indicating its greater utility to identify patients with more severe clinical involvement.

Published

2025-10-06

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>