Mimicking Preconditioning by Vagal Stimulation. Effects on Ventricular Function in a Chronic Experimental Model

pp 380-384

Authors

  • Verena B. Franco Riveros Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine (IMIBIOL) U.E. UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bruno Buchholz Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine (IMIBIOL) U.E. UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Eduardo A. Bernatené Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine (IMIBIOL) U.E. UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Martín Donato Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine (IMIBIOL) U.E. UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Ricardo J. Gelpi Institute of Cardiovascular Physiopathology, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine (IMIBIOL) U.E. UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v86.i6.14313

Keywords:

Myocardial Infarction, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Ischemia, Ventricular Remodeling

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that preischemic vagal electrostimulation (pVS) reduces acute myocardial infarct size,without a significant improvement on ventricular function within the two-hour reperfusion period. It is unknown which are thelong-term effects of pVS on left ventricular function (LVF).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze whether the protective effects of brief pVS on acute infarct size improves LVF in a chronic myocardial ischemia-reperfusion model.

Methods: FVB mice were subjected to 45-minute regional myocardial ischemia followed by 2 hours of reperfusion or 28-day postreperfusion follow-up with or without 10-minute pVS. Infarct size (IS) was measured with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride, and LVF was assessed by echocardiography and left ventricular catheterization.

Results: Preischemic vagal stimulation reduced IS from 66.8±3.2% to 43.2±1.6% (p <0.001) at 2 hours of reperfusion, without a favorable LVF response. At 28 days, the pVS group exhibited LVF improvement, with lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure(4.44±1 vs. 6.91±1 mmHg in the control group; p<0.05), higher ejection fraction (69.7±2.8% vs. 59.3±3.2; p<0.05), greater shortening fraction (33.4±2.23 vs. 25.8±1.8%; p<0.05) and lower isovolumic relaxation time (25±0.8 ms vs. 30.3±1.2 ms; p<0.05)

Conclusions: In a mice model of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, mimicking ischemic preconditioning by VS improves the chronic outcome of infarction, resulting in greater LVF recovery.

Published

2025-05-19

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>